Obama for President
On the heels of Senator Kennedy, I am officially announcing my support of Barack Obama for President.
If I was to vote on this past Friday afternoon I would have cast my ballot for Hillary Clinton. And yes, because she is a woman. Gender is a huge issue to me and I believe it should be a huge issue to every one of us. Women and men alike suffer from gender inequality in our country every damn day. Having a woman in the presidency would not be a "novelty", as my commenter suggested. What if any candidate could get up in front of a thousand people and cry when s/he feels like it? When Clinton did it, critics claimed she was "using the gender card" but if any man did it, he would likely be considered weak. I may be idealistic, but I dream of the day when anyone--man or woman--can get up on stage and cry when s/he is so moved and their audience will accept those tears as a simple expression of emotion in the moment. We will all be healthier when we reach the day that everyone can cry as freely as they laugh. I plan to hold onto this dream and continue to encourage all of you to raise your gender awareness, but I have decided that voting on this dream would be selfish, misdirected, and frankly, not enough.
Politically speaking, I favor John Edwards the most of the candidates left in the race (so long, Sen.Rep. Kuchinich.) Senator Edwards has been on the road with the same message since he lost the race to become vice pres three and a half years ago. He's an anti-corporate crusader out to raise awareness about poverty, something that is ignored too often. I commend him and I am glad he is sticking with it until the bitter end. I hope he comes back again, too. Because, as the media coverage he isn't getting reflects, right now is not his time.
Right now is the time for re-branding in America. We have spent the last seven years with a man in charge that has brought down both our domestic sense of pride and our international image. On the relatively harmless side of the spectrum, I think about how every bookstore cash register in America seems to be laden with novelty items mocking our leader's intelligence. When our citizens travel over seas we take on a Canadian identity to hide from the ridicule that seems currently inherent in being American. On the more frightening side, more children are born into an over-seas culture of hating this nation every day. Our troops and theirs continue to be killed, injured and mentally scarred on the battle grounds of the war on terror. While our government continues to force feed "American values" across the planet, a great deal of us living in this land of the free ironically feel ashamed to be American at all. This is no small problem. The urge to change this status has created the ideal climate for big change.
This brings me to Friday night and a good talk I had with my new friend, Seth. Without knowing, Seth went on a campaign to convince me to support Obama with the best argument anyone could have presented to me, an argument about image. He pointed me to Andrew Sullivan's article in the Atlantic, "Goodbye to All that: Why Obama Matters." I encourage you to read it, but allow me to share my favorite passage that encapsulates the point I am going for beautifully:
Consider this hypothetical. It's November 2008. A young Pakistani Muslim is watching television and sees that this man—Barack Hussein Obama—is the new face of America. In one simple image, America's soft power has been ratcheted up not a notch, but a logarithm. A brown-skinned man whose father was an African, who grew up in Indonesia and Hawaii, who attended a majority-Muslim school as a boy, is now the alleged enemy. If you wanted the crudest but most effective weapon against the demonization of America that fuels Islamist ideology, Obama's face gets close. It proves them wrong about what America is in ways no words can.Seth convinced me to face my own naive selfishness involved in voting for Clinton next month. If I were to vote for her, I would be voting on behalf of gender equality. I would also be voting for a name that the whole world recognizes and associates with these United States. To us there might be huge changes involved in shifting from Bush to Clinton to Bush and back to Clinton. But on a global scale would there be any reason for people to trust that we want change at all?
I am optimistic that one day we will be able to judge a person by the "content of their character." While we strive for a more collective critical awareness, we remain in a media age where image matters whether we like it or not. For right now, I am going to settle with the thought that we can be the first generation to elect a leader that does not belong to a racial majority. I need to believe that this will be a huge step toward changing our hearts and minds about assumptions we collectively hold based on the way we look, our personal histories and even our gender.
Barack Obama can be the boost we need. Who's with me?



4 comments:
One nitpick:
Kucinich is a representative not a senator.
Now that aside, I'm with you. As we discussed, in person, over some so-so Thai food, Richardson is my man because of his proven track record in foreign policy, diplomacy, and executive leadership. I couldn't honestly vote for someone else in the primary as he is the candidate most aligned with what I want in our leader--as cool as it would be to have our first female and/or black president. (People like to forget that Richardson is part latino, so he'd actually accomplish a first as well) However, it's clear Richardson is not getting the nomination.
(Side note, thank you Massachusetts for removing the requirement of party registration to vote in primaries!!)
That being said, when it comes time for the general election I'll be on the same page as you. Having Barack as president would be a fairly substantial step up for this country--something we drastically need.
And now, my marginally coherent, half-awake, been staring at requirements documents for the last 16 hours brain spew is done. Assuming I can decipher one set of barely discernible squiggly letters.
While I also support Obama, I feel like a turkey the week before Thanksgiving with ALL politicians.
I want to believe he will change corporate American into a level and fair playing field, I want to think that he will attack the drug companies into being more responsible and ethical in their marketing, research and pricing. I really do.
Being a step-son of a preacher the words of the Bible often seep into my consciousness, the ones I come up with now are....
"By their actions shall ye know them."
Lets hope together that Obama is the man he proclaims himself as, and vote with hope in the heart once again.
The NY Post, Mary F, and John V (the bellwethers of electoral sentiment) are all in agreement, Obama is the one. Is it possible that this disparate troika accurately mirrors the voters need for "Change"?
As always The Post is terse and unambiguous: "We urge them (NY Democrats) to choose Obama - an untried candidate, to be sure, but preferable to the junior senator from New York."
Mary,as usual, an erudite and logical blog of your Presidential choice. Now, if you could motivate The Boy to.....But, I digress.
pre-script: After writing this I realized that I basically just made a wordier and more homoerotic version of 'chucksense's post. so save yourself some time and just reread his.
The more I think about it the more disappointed I am in the choices available in the Democratic field. I just don't care about the gender of my president. I just don't care about their skin color either. These are both interesting facets historically for our nation, but not something they should be given bonus points for. I'm happy that women and minorities have the ability to compete for the job, as it is a terrible waste of talent to write off over half the population before we see their talents, but I find myself unimpressed with either candidate's resume. I don't care that H. Clinton wouldn't be that much fun at a party, or that Obama could easily convince me to give him a hot oil massage. I just want them to know what they are doing. So do they know what they are doing? Neither of them have anywhere near the kind of track record that I feel should be required of a serious presidential candidate.
H. Clinton has shown herself to be the definition of political tool. I think she voted for the war because she thought it would be politically expedient. In fact I think everything she has done for roughly the last 15 years has had that motive. She embodies everything that I would hope would be changed, and on top of that I'm not sure she knows what she is doing unless occasionally sleeping next to a president is a way of gaining executive experience. But we all know her name so she is going to win (See Schwarzenegger).
Obama fairs little better in my eyes. Though his track record is more easily swallowed it makes for a pretty light meal. What makes us believe that this man has the kind of decision making skills that should be required of a president? He makes me think of Supreme Court nominees. Somehow he has used his lack of having taken a position on anything to be a bonus. I just feel like I need to see a prolonged and consistent record of good decision making. Come back in 8 years.
I'm not going to entirely discount the idea that a black man named Obama might make extremists recruiting jobs a bit harder, but I think it should be noted that they have specific problems with American foreign policy. Unless Obama changes those policies I think it will be a short honeymoon between our new president and the would be terrorist. They clearly don't mind blowing up not only their countrymen, but people that are ethnically and culturally much more similar to them than a black Hawaiian. It also appears that they will be using the mentally handicapped to carry out those bombings (p.s. does this mean they're running out of suicide bombers or they just really want to be the most terrible bastards possible?)
What happened to Bill Richardson? He had it all: an experienced minority, plus he was a woman. His resume is sort of embarrassingly rich with everything that you would want from your president. I'm really pulling for a VP nod for this guy.
That all being said, I'll vote for Obama because I'm an optimist and a liberal. If H. Clinton gets the primary nod I'll probably stay home election day.
Post a Comment